Tag Results
20 posts tagged logic

20 posts tagged logic
During my recent visit back home, a close relative gave me this book and made me promise to read it. It may take a while to get to, but I’ll write a review when I’m done.
*sigh* Foreword by Rick Warren. Greeeeat…
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated, uh I mean “saved.”
When Faith wants to be taken seriously, it must put forth the appearance of Reason.
(via psych0naut)
A traditional religion, one built on “right belief,” requires a closed information system. That is why the Catholic Church put an official seal of approval on some ancient texts and banned or burned others. It is why some Bible-believing Christians are forbidden to marry nonbelievers. It is why Quiverfull moms home school their kids from carefully screened text books. It is why, when you get sucked into conversations with your fundamentalist uncle George from Florida, you sometimes wonder if he has some superpower that allows him to magically close down all avenues into his mind. (He does!)
Religions have spent eons honing defenses that keep outside information away from insiders. The innermost ring wall is a set of certainties and associated emotions like anxiety and disgust and righteous indignation that block curiosity. The outer wall is a set of behaviors aimed at insulating believers from contradictory evidence and from heretics who are potential transmitters of dangerous ideas. These behaviors range from memorizing sacred texts to wearing distinctive undergarments to killing infidels. Such defenses worked beautifully during humanity’s infancy. But they weren’t really designed for the current information age.
***
A brilliantly stated summary of ideas I’ve been thinking about for the last couple of years or so. While broadly-stated “religion” as such is unlikely to disappear from human culture in any foreseeable future, the old monoliths are going away. It’s a done deal.
The emerging 24/7 interconnected Information Age will be what finally brings the old edifices of conventional religion to a state of permanent obsolescence. The sheltered propaganda bubbles that protected the obsolete ideologies from competition and critical scrutiny just don’t work anymore.
The false premises of Abrahamic monotheism don’t hold up to critical scrutiny; they cannot compete in the arena of ideas with our refined and continually evolving understanding of how our world really works, who and what we really are, and the way we should see ourselves.
Understand this, and the last few years of hysteria, desperation and moral panic from the guardians of the expiring Aeons will make a lot more sense. Look for the “true believers” to publicly double down on their rigid dogmatic ideologies for a time. The retreat to ever-shrinking home-schooled, sheltered enclaves will continue. Then look for phony tears of victimhood and persecution when their opinions are not magically exempt from criticism and the rules of evidence.
Others, who follow conventional religions more from conditioning and habit than anything else, will begin to catch on. The emotional implications of such a transition can be difficult (take it from me). Now is the time to encourage the best kind of curiosity in our friends and loved ones, and make the most of the freely-available knowledge and learning at the disposal of most anyone reading these words. Now is the time to question old assumptions about what our options are (i.e., monotheism vs. atheism) and proactively shape the emerging Aeon into one that maximizes actual - as opposed to rhetorical - Life (in the life-worship, “really living instead of just existing” sense of the word), Liberty (i.e., “more, not fewer choices for future action”), and the Pursuit of Happiness for all, not just married religious straight Americans.
Every end of every “world,” every “age,” every Aeon is the birth of a new beginning. This is a great time to begin remaking your own.
XEPER::REMANIFEST::REYN TIL RUNA
—Brother Virgil
Between the sneering contempt of Piers Morgan and the shrieking, pants-shitting hysteria of Alex Jones, there is the voice of Reason.
Former English Literature scholar and children’s fiction author C.S. Lewis has come to be venerated as a paragon of Christian apologetics. “Go read C.S. Lewis! He was an atheist who studied the evidence and then became Christian!” is a common slogan I hear repeated again and again by apologists. They of course ignore my return request to go read Bart Erhman, Hector Avalos, and Robert Price – all New Testament experts and former apologists who turned atheist or agnostic due to a lack of evidence – and reason that a cheesy children’s author, whose background was in fictional literature, is somehow a more trustworthy authority.
Lewis was a philosopher like I’m a figure skater.
(via skepticalavenger)
wow, well done.
In the bottom chart, etc is under-represented by about a million percent. Also, it could make a difference exactly what kind of Catholic/Baptist/whatever you are. Still, the bottom chart give a much better representation than the top. :)
Afterlife myths are a dime a dozen. So by what rationale are “Heaven,” “Hell,” and “Nothing” our ONLY options for serious consideration? Assuming some form of survival of the psyche beyond physical death, upon what basis must we assume that psyche must “go” anywhere it doesn’t choose to?
Being rhetorical, of course. And I could go into my own further dissections of conventional afterlife debate, but I’ve got homework, computer maintenance and sketchbook work to attend to. Suffice it to say, Pascal’s Wager is a joke.
(via skepticalavenger)
“To fight the efforts of governments to criminalize speech critical of religion, and to push back against calls for global restrictions on free speech, the Center for Inquiry launches the Campaign for Free Expression. Timed to commence with International Blasphemy Rights Day, the Campaign aims to increase public awareness of threats to free expression, and develop plans to fight back, both in the world’s halls of power and at the grassroots.”
***
Because ideas that can’t withstand criticism are probably wrong anyway.
No believer respects a different believer’s beliefs. Christians disregard the Jewish holy day (Saturday) and the Jews disregard the Christian’s holy day (Sunday). Christians and Jews disregard the Hindu’s sacred cow, and so does MacDonalds. Muslims disparage the Jewish beliefs, and Christians disregard Islamic beliefs. The humble atheist simply is an equal opportunity disregarder - it ignore every ones religious beliefs! It is unrealistic for a believer to expect otherwise as their subjective beliefs are only precious to those that choose to adopt them, and usually, even they change what they choose to follow, over time.
Respect is for people. Beliefs proven to be false do not deserve respect.
Co-signed. Criticism of ideas is not hate speech. Criticism of actions that merit criticism is not hate speech. When you criticize someone’s beliefs and they instantly play the Victim Card, call them out. This phony victimhood business has got to go. (Yes, butthurt Muslim; I’m looking at you too…)
(via skepticalavenger)
Jesus was married…? “An obvious hoax! Get real, people!”
Jesus performed miracles and rose from the dead…? “Seems legit…”
However it works, it always works out that you’re wrong, and I’m right.
I cannot PROVE there are no invisible Smurfs living in my sock drawer (well of course you can’t see them; they’re *invisible*), ergo there *must* be invisible Smurfs living in my sock drawer.
SWEET!
I will never forgive Growing Pains for inflicting Kirk Cameron upon us all.
(via skepticalavenger)
I’d say 80-95 percent of what is often called “Conspiracy Theory” would be more properly called “Conspiracy Fantasy.” To call a lot of this garbage “theory” cheapens and denigrates the scientific method. An actual “theory” may be incomplete, but is at least subject to the rules of evidence.
So I propose a new term for Birthers, Ickers, the GoldBunker.com crowd and other delusional goofsticks: conspiracy fantasists. Let’s not insult legitimate theory by association with those who can’t tell fact from opinion, much less evidence from propaganda.
In the weeks to come, as the Fakes News/Hate Radio Axis of Ignorance push the phony “War On Marriage” narrative, every time you read or hear “War On Marriage,” replace the word “Marriage” with “Theocracy.” Everything will make much more sense that way.
If you can’t support your opinions with clear definitions, valid evidence and sound logic, changing the subject by playing the Victim Card is unlikely to help your case.